Sex offending is of increasing public concern with calls for longer terms of imprisonment and closer supervision of such offenders in the community. Currently a variety of treatment approaches are used including medication and talking therapies, though little is known about their success rates. The small group of sex offenders with learning disabilities pose a particular challenge as talking therapies need to be modified to account for the offender's limited understanding. We could find no randomised controlled trial evidence to guide us in the treatment of learning disabled sex offenders.

This is a Cochrane review abstract and plain language summary, prepared and maintained by The Cochrane Collaboration, currently published in The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010 Issue 7, Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.. The full text of the review is available in The Cochrane Library (ISSN 1464-780X).
This record should be cited as: Ashman LLM, Duggan L. Interventions for learning disabled sex offenders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD003682. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003682.pub2

Editorial Group: Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Group

This version first published online: April 22. 2002
Last assessed as up-to-date: September 1. 2007

Abstract

Background

The management of sex offenders is a major public concern. Behavioural and pharmacological interventions have been used for many years and more recently cognitive behavioural based interventions have become popular around the world. Programmes designed for the general population have been modified for those sex offenders with learning disability, to address their cognitive deficits. The efficacy of these modified programmes is unclear.

Objectives

To determine the efficacy of interventions with learning disabled sex offenders.

Search strategy

The reviewers searched the Cochrane Library 2006 (Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to Sept 2006), Embase (1980 to September 2006), CINAHL (1982 to September 2006), PsycINFO (1872 to September 2006), Biological Abstracts (1980 to September 2006).

Selection criteria

All randomised controlled trials comparing an intervention for learning disabled sex offenders to any other, or no intervention.

Data collection and analysis

Data were independently extracted.

Main results

No randomised controlled trial was identified.

Authors' conclusions

Using the methods described the reviewers found no randomised controlled trial evidence to guide the use of interventions for learning disabled sex offenders. Until the urgent need for randomised controlled trials is met, clinical practice will continue to be guided by either extrapolation of evidence from randomised controlled trials involving sex offenders without learning disability or non-randomised trial evidence of interventions for the learning disabled sex offender.

top of page | contact us | about this site | disclaimer | privacy