|
The Cochrane Collaboration
Cochrane Reviews |
| Explore | New + Updated | Other languages |
|
Treatment for familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron diseaseBenatar M, Kurent J, Moore DH SummaryTreatment for familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosisAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also known as motor neuron disease (MND) and Lou Gehrig's disease, is a rare disease in which degeneration of motor nerves leads to progressive weakness and wasting of muscles. For the most part, the cause of ALS is unknown. In a small proportion of cases there is a family history of ALS/MND and in an even smaller proportion, the disease is known to result from a change in a gene known as SOD1. An understanding of the genetic basis for one familial form of ALS/MND has permitted the construction of an animal model of ALS/MND (the SOD1 mouse) that has been used extensively to study potential therapeutic agents for the human disease. None of the drugs found to be effective in the mouse have translated into therapeutic benefits for humans with ALS/MND. There are several possible explanations for this finding, one of which is that successful treatments in the mouse model (based on the genetic form of ALS/MND) are more likely to be effective in patients with the familial form of the disease. In an effort to begin to address this question, this review was undertaken in order to ask whether or not people with the familial form of the disease respond differently to treatment than patients with the sporadic (or non-familial) form of ALS/MND. We identified all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in ALS/MND and wrote to the authors to request the data needed to complete this review. Although many more studies were eligible for inclusion, only four authors were willing to share the data from their individual RCTs. Based on the analyses of these data, we find no evidence to support a statistically significant difference in the response to treatment between patients with the familial and sporadic forms of ALS/MND. This is a Cochrane review abstract and plain language summary, prepared
and maintained by The Cochrane Collaboration, currently published in
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010 Issue 7, Copyright ©
2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley and Sons, Ltd..
The full text of the review is available in The
Cochrane Library (ISSN 1464-780X). Editorial Group: Neuromuscular Disease Group This version first published online: January 21. 2009 AbstractBackgroundAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also known as motor neuron disease (MND), is a rare neurodegenerative disease. Approximately 5% to 7% of ALS/MND patients report a family history of a similarly affected relative. Superoxide dismutase-1 gene mutations are the cause in about 20% of familial cases. In those with non-familial (sporadic) ALS/MND the cause is unknown. Also unknown is whether patients with familial and sporadic ALS/MND respond differently to treatment. ObjectivesTo systematically review the literature and to answer the specific question: 'Is there a difference in the response to treatment between patients with sporadic and familial forms of ALS?' Search strategyIn May 2006 we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register, MEDLINE (January 1966 to May 2006) and EMBASE (January 1980 to May 2006) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two review authors read the titles and abstracts of all articles and reviewed the full text of all possibly relevant articles. We scanned references of all included trials to identify additional relevant articles. For all trials eligible for inclusion we contacted the authors to request the necessary raw data. Selection criteriaStudies had to meet two criteria: (a) randomized controlled study design, and (b) inclusion of patients with both familial and sporadic ALS/MND. Data collection and analysisWe attempted to contact authors of all trials that met inclusion criteria. We obtained data regarding ALS/MND type (sporadic versus familial), treatment assignment (active versus placebo), survival and ALS Functional Rating Scale scores for four large RCTs that included 822 sporadic and 41 familial ALS patients. We could not obtain data from 25 potentially eligible studies (17 trial authors could not be contacted and eight were unwilling to provide data). Main resultsThere was no statistical evidence for a different response to treatment in patients with familial ALS/MND compared to those with sporadic ALS/MND. The pooled estimate of the hazard ratio for the interaction term (treatment x familial ALS) suggested a more beneficial response with respect to survival among patients with familial ALS/MND, but the result was not statistically significant. Estimates of the rate of decline on the ALS Functional Rating Scale also suggested a slightly better response to treatment among those with familial ALS/MND, but the result was not statistically significant. Authors' conclusionsFuture RCTs should document whether patients with familial ALS/MND are included and the presence or absence of a mutation in the superoxide dismutase-1 gene amongst those with familial ALS/MND. |